Re: Covid 19: The Trampling Of Human Rights May Additionally By No Means Heal

Dear Editor

The WHO has said that they, ”do no longer propose lockdowns because the primary approach of manipulate of this virus…. it seems that we might also well have a doubling of worldwide poverty through next yr. We may additionally nicely have at least a doubling of baby malnutrition”(i). The results of ‘lockdown’ may additionally consequently encompass lack of life, contravening Article 2 of the Human Rights Act 1998, which states, “Everyone’s proper to existence shall be covered by means of law”.

Part I: Article three: ”No one will be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading remedy or punishment”. Detaining vintage people in care homes towards their will and prohibiting them from seeing or touching their cherished ones, quantities to inhuman treatment and psychological torture. Social isolation is nicely documented to purpose psychological damage (ii). The equal applies to hospitalised patients who are stored other than the ones whose presence might otherwise make a contribution to their healing. Withholding scientific offerings from patients affected by most cancers and different extreme diseases additionally constitutes inhuman treatment. Terrifying the population with ever-converting death narratives via the mainstream media unavoidably predisposes to mental unwell-fitness troubles amongst those of the overall public who accept as true with what they see and pay attention (iii).

Article five: “Everyone has the right to liberty and safety of man or woman. No one shall be deprived of his liberty….except for the lawful detention of individuals for the prevention of the spreading of infectious illnesses”. This clearly presupposes that the detained man or woman is unwell with an infectious disorder in preference to healthful and asymptomatic, from whom transmission has been defined by means of the WHO as, “very uncommon” (iv) (v). Healthy people were saved below house arrest notwithstanding showing no proof of a transmissible disorder and having committed no crime.

Article eight: “Everyone has the proper to respect for his private and family existence, his domestic and his correspondence”. Preventing own family members from meeting each other is a breach of their human rights, seeing that where is the conclusive evidence that wholesome people pose a danger to each other and society? And in which are the risk tests as to both effects and proportionality?

Article 9: “Everyone has the proper to freedom of concept, conscience and faith; this right consists of freedom to alternate his religion or notion and freedom, either on my own or in community with others and in public or personal, to appear his faith or belief, in worship, coaching, practice and observance”. The enforced closure of locations of worship, and policies prohibiting making a song and amassing in network, contravene these rights, whilst other venues which includes supermarkets and puppy shops aren’t situation to the equal policies.

Article 10: “Everyone has the right to freedom of expression. This right shall encompass freedom to preserve opinions and to receive and impart data and thoughts without interference with the aid of public authority and irrespective of frontiers”. The censoring of perspectives, specially views of respected health workers and discussion of legitimate and relevant topics pertaining to ‘covid’ remedies and vaccination, in the mainstream media, social media and in public locations, infringes this proper (vi).

Article 11: “Everyone has the proper to freedom of peaceful meeting and to freedom of affiliation with others”. In the absence of clear clinical evidence, the extraordinary quarantining of healthy people infringes their rights, particularly while the authorities said that, “As of nineteen March 2020, COVID-19 is no longer considered to be a high outcome infectious sickness (HCID) inside the UK” (vii).

Article 12: “Men and women of marriageable age have the right to marry and to discovered a circle of relatives”. ‘Lockdown’ prevents ladies and men assembly each other and forming normal relationships thereby infringing their proper to located a circle of relatives (viii).

Article 14: “The leisure of the rights and freedoms set forth in this Convention will be secured with out discrimination on any ground”. Individuals with critical ailments have had their remedies postponed or denied in favour of filling health center beds with ‘covid’ patients. This is discrimination on the grounds of prognosis. An unreliable PCR take a look at is therefore getting used as a device to discriminate between individuals who are entitled to treatment and people who aren’t, irrespective of the consequences for his or her health (ix).

Article 17: “Nothing in this Convention can be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any right to have interaction in any activity or carry out any act aimed toward the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms set forth herein”. The authorities, therefore, abuses the rights of individuals via arbitrarily setting up policies which infringe the Articles defined.

Part II, Article 2: “No man or woman shall be denied the proper to schooling”. Closing faculties when youngsters aren’t at hazard from the virus denies them the right to training, especially when you consider that a few dad and mom won’t be equipped to provide the situations or competencies for home education. This consists of discrimination in favour of the kids of so-called ‘key employees’ who on my own had been accepted to wait faculty.

Part III: Article 1 of the Thirteenth Protocol: “Abolition of the death penalty”. If ‘Do Not Resuscitate’ (DNR) notices are connected to sufferers with out their knowledgeable consent or following the coerced consent of their next of relatives or carer, this will be interpreted as a demise sentence with out enchantment (x). Similarly, if elderly patients are again to care homes earlier than their hospital inpatient treatment is entire to be able to make way for younger ‘covid’ patients, or, if there was a refusal via doctors to admit elderly sufferers to sanatorium, which could effectively amount to a demise sentence for a few very ill people. Euthanasia is unlawful within the UK.

The creator isn’t always a lawyer. There may be nuances of statute law which offer a exceptional interpretation. However, from the point of view of residing men and women, and in keeping with Natural Law, “Every infant born is endowed with unalienable liberties that no authority, regulation, authorities or religion can lessen or abolish. Any strength that tries to achieve this is tyrannical and illegitimate, even if it operates under its very own legal guidelines”. And, further, “Under Common Law, all citizens, including the very best-ranking officers of the authorities, are difficulty to the identical set of laws, and the workout of presidency power is restricted via those laws (xi).

(i) Wall E. WHO condemn lockdowns and say they ‘handiest make bad human beings poorer’. 2020 10 Oct.

(ii) McAndrew FT. The Perils of Social Isolation. Psychology Today 2016 Nov 20.

(iii) kingdom/authorities/organisations/behavioural-insights-group



(vi) Jacklin N. What Does the London Arrest of Dr Heiko Schoning Mean? Principia Scientifica International 2020 Oct 6.


(viii) kingdom/guidance/national-lockdown-live-at-home#meeting-different…


(x) Hickey S. Nurse lifts lid on “despicable” DNR practice in hospitals for the duration of Covid-19 top. LBC 2020 Aug 24.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *